Reseñas

• gamedeal user

  Jul 27, 2014

  I can't really recommend this game. It is beautiful and the controls are nice, however there is nobody online. Maybe once it's out of early access I can change my review, but even if there were people online to play with, the game has other issues. Namely, no controller support in any of the menus. It's very obviosuly designed for PC, which doesn't have to be a bad thing, but in this case it is. I'm trying to play on my TV while sitting back in my recliner and the menus are difficult to read and navigate. The UI is overly complex for a racing game, in my opinion.
• gamedeal user

  Nov 7, 2014

  Before I begin, I just wanted to share a very important fact. This game was available for free through amazon. When I first found it on amazon, it was a free to play game. that's all well and good, but when I found it for $15 on steam, that got me kind of iffy on the whole thing. it basically told me that they're charging for something they were willing to give out for free. But, I can get past that. What this game does well is customization and gameplay. the controls are solid, the cars feel weighty and there's a fair bit of options available to customize your car right off the bat. all plusses in my book. So, The reason I don't recommend this is because there was no offline modes to be found. every single race was online. on top of that, there really aren't enough people playing to fill a race. personally, I had a hard time finding just one more person so I could actually race. That's because the race won't start if you're by yourself. the only time it does is if you're in hotlap mode. but the thing about that is this: you don't get credit for hotlaps. Nope. no rewards for that. none. All in all, Age of Racing is a story of high potential with all the resources already there. but the game was let down by always online gameplay that's even brought triple-A games to their knees. if they ever add offline, I'll recommend it. but as long as it stays online only, I can't bring myself to do it.
• gamedeal user

  Dec 5, 2014

  This game is dead. Avoid. This is just another "early access" game that's all broken promises, where the developers get paid for half a job done, then they disappear. Worst of all, the driving mechanics are pitiful and ardcade-like. The graphics are initially impressive, but soon become tiresome and repetative. Not worth your money, not worth your time.
• gamedeal user

  Dec 16, 2014

  [b]tl;dr This game is fun, but overwhelming and dead. Developers have abandoned this game and left to work on the next one.[/b] [i]Victory: The Age of Racing[/i] is a racing simulator akin to stuff like Formula 1, but with arcade gameplay controls in the vehicles. I'm much more of an arcade racer (hence my repeated Black Flags when I play anything in here), so Victory does cater to my tastes as well as the average sim fan. The cars are very well modeled, and the tracks are pleasing enough. However, the UI is incredibly overwhelming to me, and it's not intuitive for me to get around at all. I'm sure I haven't even discovered half of the menus because of how much there is to take in. Additionally, the multiplayer is dead and you'd be lucky to find anyone who plays this. Most importantly, as other reviews have pointed out, the developers - Vae Victis Games - have fully abandoned Victory. [b]The game has not been updated in years.[/b] They started working on a new game called Racecraft but beware, [b]they have abandoned their new game too[/b]. Avoid this game and avoid this developer.
• gamedeal user

  Dec 19, 2014

  Game is pretty dead, player-side and development-side. Looks good, sounds good, just is not implemented well, and doesn't have the playerbase as a result. Would not recommend.
• gamedeal user

  Feb 5, 2015

  This game always has to be online. The only option is to play online with other people. And when there's nobody to play it, money is better spent on more fun games. EDIT: This is nearly a year after the review publish date on Feb 8, 2015. It is now October 10th of the same year, and the game isn't even out of beta. The game came out on Feb 10th, 2014. Do you see the faith in this game.
• gamedeal user

  Apr 8, 2015

  Unfortunately, the game is dead as can be. No players, no developers around. It's a shame though, the graphics and gameplay are decent enough, but far from complete.
• gamedeal user

  Jun 17, 2015

  Valve should really remove dead games. Hardly anybody plays this game, and since there is no singleplayer/AI mode, the game is practically unplayable. Waste of $15.
• gamedeal user

  Feb 12, 2014

  A few things so far about Victory: The Age of Racing: (This is not an actual review) - The game menu looks quite satisfying and is clearly arranged. - This game is definitely pay to win. Proof? The developers are presenting the "build your own car" thing as one of the main features. At the beginning you have already one car of each class so you can start right of racing. so far so good. to build your own car, you need at last (probably with extra parts and stuff a few 100 more) 5200 Gears Credits (the only ingame currency). If you win one of these early multiplayer races (don't know if its getting noticeably more when you progress) you get ~100 GC. So, to build your own the cheapest car of any class, without spending real money, wou have to win like 50 races. Races i've driven were appr. 4 - 6 minutes. In comparison: You can buy one of these predefined cars for the half of the price, which might be even a bit faster. So i think that the real money thing ones again ruins a game by slowing it down horribly, which equals pay to win to me. - Gameplay is (after years of developement of this former-free-to-play game) like Mario Kart without Toads and bananas, but more buggy and erratic. But still quite fun to drive, a bit like trackmania. In conclusion this game is very arcadish, while it is published to have "realistic car physics". One of the game developers once said in an interview with insidesimracing on Youtube (2012), that at the beginning, when they startet the title as free-to-play, they thought about not making one of these ptw games. Now the game is still in developement, is ptp and even ptw, too. I kind of regret buying it. At the moment i have, to be honest, no MASSIVE complaint about the game how it is. It's okay, not more or less. But if you make the "mistake" to judge this game by what it pretends to be, it's absolutely not enough and seems like a bit of a hoax. At the end i have to put a careful "YET", as the developers have time to and possibilities to fix these points, hopefully.
• gamedeal user

  Feb 15, 2014

  My last review was negative and i decided to change it because (in a very fast way) developers decided to change the whole "buy gears" system they had in earlier versions back when the game was Free-to-Play. The game is really nice; and best of all is that it is an Early Access and you'll probably see a lot of changes and improvements. Keep up the good work and THANK YOU FOR LISTENING TO US!